All geek questions in one place

SmalltalkHub vs SqueakSource3

The next time you close the SqueakSource repository, I wonder what SmalltalkHub has over SqueakSource3 . Is there a flaw in SqueakSource3?

I noticed that basic features like explore seem to be broken in SmalltalkHub, which is understandable because it is still in beta testing, but why move or register projects in SmalltalkHub?

+6
source share
3 answers

Pharo core development takes place entirely on SmalltalkHub.

This is much faster than SqueakSource3, which is the main point in favor of this. SmalltalkHub is still expanding and new features are on the way. For a typical use case on the image side, the difference between them is small or not.

+7
source

SmalltalkHub is faster than SS3. This is a new look. You can manage the team and employees using a modern interface. Nicolas Petton uses it daily for work, and in addition, he will continue to improve it. There are all the basic Pharo packages. Finally, you can also easily install and use SmalltalkHub in your company if you need it. The software package for SmalltalkHub is really solid and nice. Several companies use it for other projects.

+3
source

From risk prevention POV, there is something to be said to keep them in both. Their software stacks and feature sets are quite different. Just make sure you define it as primary. Copying monticello files from one repository to another is easily automated. Stef has provided some scripts to copy all projects from squeaksource to smalltalkhub recently, they would work equally well on canary or ss3.

+2
source

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/948312/

More articles:


All Articles