In this case, there really is no way for the question you ask to do what you want. The problem with your request is "serializing everything related to the object, including functions".
Serialization usually occurs only for data, since executable files are usually linked by a machine, because they are compiled for a given machine based on certain characteristics. Now itβs wise to say that javascript functions just require a javascript interpreter because javascript is the one and only one that works everywhere. But when people write serializers, because all serializers tend to work the same way, we only write them for data. In this case, the industry standard is JSON, which is a serializer for object data only.
Currently there are three solutions available to you:
- Create your own serializer / deserializer that encapsulates functions. This can be tricky because not all javascript engines will give you access to the source.
- Write your own reload mechanism, which generates a specific new initialized type for each restore and saves the type name as one of the properties during serialization. Thus, initializing each variable gives you methods, and then merging with the data gives you a complete object.
- Store each function as a string and evaluate it on the go as you need. This is incredibly complicated and it is quite error prone. I can not think of a single case when it becomes useful, because it is quite fragile. However, this is an option and cannot be ignored.
I know that 3 is a sub-answer for 1, so you can assume that there are only two useful answers.
I know that this works superficially on Chrome and IE9, so it should work everywhere, most users will most likely use it:
var abc = function(thing) { return thing; } abc.toString();
This way you can serialize methods as strings instead of the actual method, but you will need to create a duplicate object so that you can capture every element of the original object (I think, instead of replacing them in place).
Hope this helps you think a little bit about the problem and perhaps realize that you don't need to serialize the methods (no one ever does what I know is not wise).
source share