In WAS 6, if you left the user ID in the admin panel blank, the space was passed to WMQ. WMQ will start the channel, even if it cannot determine the remote user, in which case the channel works with the authority of the Message Channel Agent (MCA), which is always administrative. Therefore, in V6 it works.
As in the case of V7, the WMQ client will try to make it a little more difficult to determine which identifier should pass if you leave it blank in the WAS admin panel and get the JVM ID and pass it on a CONNECT call. This is the source of 2035.
The correct way to fix this is for the WMQ administrator to put the low priority identifier in the MCACUSER field of the SVRCONN channel. The identifier must be authorized in any queues that are required by the Java EE server, but not in the command queue and in other administrative queues. This will fix the problem where WAS 7 sends an unrecognized identifier, and prevents any type of remote client access from administrator access to this channel.
An alternative is to go to the WAS control panel to connect WMQ and set the user ID on mqm . (This works if WMQ is running on a distributed system other than Windows. If WMQ is running on Windows, z / OS or something else, replace the equivalent platform identifier here.) Although this will work with WAS, it does not address that fact QMgr provides administrative access.
Please view the WMQ Hardening presentation and lab at http://t-rob.net/links for a more complete explanation of how to identify and address the underlying security impact on QMgr.
source share