In C and C ++ ! denies the result:
!
if( !( a == b ) )
In the diagram, I found only eq? . How to say "not equal"? Or should we say bluntly
eq?
(eq? #f (eq? expr expr))
The circuit has not , so you can do: (not (eq? expr expr))
not
(not (eq? expr expr))
Could you try to guess?
(not #f) ==> #t
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/886435/More articles:Where is the NHibernate 3.1 Session Query Method? - sessionCorrectly using the position - wolfram-mathematicaHow to call the AppDelegate method from RootViewController without passing delegate? - iostemplate class restriction - c ++What causes this strange Mathematica result? - wolfram-mathematicaHow to get strings as arrays (not hashes) in an ORM extension? - ruby | fooobar.comNAnt MVC publishes website - .netCompiling C program with dbus header files - cTurning off test output in TestNG - javaPublish WebApplication using NAnt - buildAll Articles