We are creating a completely new TFS 2010 server without using TFS before (or, oddly enough, no other central source management system). Here, the general structure of our small team (of 6-7 programmers) spoke about customization, and I'm curious, based on the experience of others working with TFS, if this is a good idea or not (these names are simply descriptive, not what we plan to use ):
$/ Our Organization Collection/ .Net technology projects/ class libraries projects/ Project 1/ Project 2/ Project 3/ etc.../ ASP.NET projects/ Project 1/ Project 2/ Project 3/ etc.../ Windows Workflow Foundation projects/ etc.../ WPF projects/ etc.../ Other non .NET source code/ SQL/ Server configuration/
(etc.)
Will we regret this structure after a year of use? The application will cover many parts of this structure - will this be a problem for management?
At what level do we configure release / main / dev branches?
Thanks for any input and guidance!
. .
, /, , ( , ). VSS TFS2010 " " , :
, . , . TFS , , .
, , , , . , , ; , , DOCUMENT ; , . , , , .
, . , .
:
, , , , . - , /. , TFS / .
Team Project . Team Project - , . . :
. ( / ). .
, . - ?
@hangy, TFS 2010 , codeplex Visual Studio TFS 2010 .
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1793153/More articles:Как программно сказать, сколько памяти использует приложение iOS? - memory-managementAre custom buttons in the warning window possible? - javascriptWhat is the shortest code for writing text / image in HWND - c ++Как удалить файлы из нескольких неизвестных папок из одного файла bat? - directoryRails, scope, OR and unions - scopeNeither connectionDidFinishLoading: nor didFailWithError: get invoked - objective-cDoes jQuery Lazy make a real profit? - performanceHow do you download the rails application on a remote server in Development? - ruby-on-railsUITableView: hide cells animated? - objective-cHudson performs only one task, not parallel - javaAll Articles