There is a philosophical question.Why is it worth having an "enterprise container" in java? Why not support enterprise container capabilities at the JVM level?For example, what if I want to use some EJB features in my desktop application. Is there something wrong in terms of architecture? You can use Spring “enterprise features” without a “corporate container” like Glassfish, even without a “servlet container” like Tomcat. And that's good, isn't it?
Thank.
JVM . , J2EE, .
, EJB Container ( , ) , .
:
Enterprise Server , - ( XML , ). , JVM , , Entisisy.
, J2EE . J2EE JVM . Iregardless - .
, J2EE-, JVM, , , .
, JVM -, Java, 6- .
2 .
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1789474/More articles:WCF Performance - c #Is there an effective way to get notified of changes to an attribute of an HTML DOM element? - javascriptHow to reboot Tomcat on a remote server if the application crashes? - tomcatСоздать непрерывный файл с помощью С#? - c#Просмотр переключателя с помощью ViewFlipper - androidМожно ли запускать тесты в качестве пользователя "Local System"? - .netHow to pinch in WPF - c #Multilingual URLs with ASP.NET MVC - asp.net-mvcПочему ActionMailer (rails 2.3.5) начинает пересылать текст /html электронную почту с перерывами? - rubyIs there a way to define a SQL Server stored procedure that returns a recordset - sqlAll Articles