We used MVVMLight for a while, and we were exploring the possibility of switching to using Caliburn.Micro. As we watched, our designer guy complained because the mix doesn't do a good job in Injection Dependency.
Further thoughts about this made me think. Caliburn.Micro does not use bindings at all, and Silverlight 5 allows breakpoints for bindings. Is it that we would not just use Caliburn.Micro? What are your thoughts on this?
C.M , " " Name ViewModel ( ). , ( C.M - ).
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1779041/More articles:https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&pto=aue&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ru&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=https://fooobar.com/questions/1779036/fastest-ways-to-set-and-get-a-bit&usg=ALkJrhi5JRuGVx2Sw9ta9VYmJpUjqyquZARoxygen, создание пакета и использование. Rd2 = TRUE - rИдиоматическое метапрограммирование - referenceXMl schema: unique key values in parent - xmlRun the script on a specific date? - linuxhttps://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&pto=aue&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ru&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=https://fooobar.com/questions/1779042/converting-mspec-tests-to-plain-nunit&usg=ALkJrhhoNN9Apqh0npMMLk9gP1BLnl7y8gFormatting dates in Freemarker to say Today, Yesterday, etc. - dateDateDiff window in SQL Server - sqlIs there such a thing as streaming processing in python? - pythonOracle 11g and database connection - javaAll Articles