Should we use jms?

Question

My company must send messages from one server to another server. This is about 500,000 messages per day. My manager insists on using JMS, however he really does not understand JMS.

Do you think we need to use JMS to ensure that the message is sent? Where can I find an example for such a case as above?

Answer 1

You use JMS when you want to process things asynchronously. You can configure it as fault-tolerant as you want, so if the message operation failed, the message is not lost. Your requirements are pretty vague, but JMS seems like a good solution here.

Spring , JMS.

Answer 2

JMS . , . , , JMS. , , .

, , JMS- - , , apache ActiveMQ , , , , : http://activemq.apache.org/

ActiveMQ JMS, .

Answer 3

AMQP.
RabbitMQ ( , Spring Framework:-))
RabbitMQ .

Answer 4

. , Eneter Messaging Framework.
. .
: http://www.eneter.net/OnlineHelp/EneterMessagingFramework/Index.html
: http://eneter.blogspot.com/
: http://www.eneter.net