I am working on creating an initial set of user stories for a new project, and this is my first time using MSF Agile. I have about 100 user stories, and I assigned them all to areas and iterations, but the next step for me is to assign all of their risk values, history, and stack level. However, I find that I assign almost mirror opposite values to risk points and history, i.e. All my stories with one high risk are 3 story points, and all my stories with 3 low risks are 1 story.
The MSDN documentation defines these fields as such:
" History points : a subjective unit of measure that captures the size of a user's history. If you assign more points to a user's history, you indicate that it takes more work to implement it."
" Risk : subjective rating of relative uncertainty around the successful completion of the user's history. You can specify the following values: 1 - High, 2 - Medium, 3 - Low p>
I find that they go hand in hand to a large extent in every situation that I have encountered. In your experience, what examples of high-risk stories are worth a few stories, or low-risk stories that cost a lot of points?
I need help in thinking about this in different ways. How should I think about it?
source
share