I found a dissertation on forums :
If you have a type with "Manager" in the name, this is a candidate for refactoring.
One answer:
I know that he counted the code "smell"
So ... why? Is this thesis correct?
There are many managers. For example, Ogre3d uses a lot of them, and this engine really has a clean architecture.
Ogre3d uses a lot of them, and this engine really has a clean architecture.
, "manager". DefaultSceneManager . , , "".
, , "", . : , , , -. "", , - , .
, , - . , , , . , .
SRP suffix , , "ConnectionPoolManager". , , .
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1770635/More articles:Custom UITableViewCell and animation on setSelected: animated: - iosHow to define a map and collapse to search trees? - searchВопрос о конкретном случае использования на spring - springIs Cilk's approach to shared memory parallel to panacea programming? - performanceWindows API Wrapper for .Net? - c #Market in Windows Phone 7 Emulator - windows-phone-7Как создать индекс столбца последовательного номера в таблице с данными - sqlLinq dynamic queries with Entity Framework - optimizationPython class decorator - pythonCan I change the text of a TextView link after using Linkify? - androidAll Articles