As stated in this task, start by defining the Big-O notation.
F(x) = O(G(x)) IFF there exist constants k and m,
such that for all n > m, k*|G(n)| > F(n).
(Refer to the text tag for the exact wording here.)
Informally, this means that if we go far enough, then G (n) will dominate F (n), regardless of how big an initial advantage we give F (n) using constant factors.
So how do you confirm something like this?
Evidence like this is usually carried out constructively - showing that certain well-chosen values for m and k do the work of inequality.
. m k, . / , 1/n ( ), , m k .
( Loadmaster): . 1/n = O (1) - , , "". , (, P, NP, EXP), .