All geek questions in one place

Telerik Extensions for ASP.NET MVC - Effective Implications

I used quite a few Telerik RadControls for AJAX, and although I was very pleased with the controls, I found that the performance was less than with conventional controls.

I'm wondering how they will affect performance (what you know) regarding MVC extensions in traditional jQuery libraries (e.g. Telerik MVC Grid VS jqGrid).

Basically, how well do Telerik MVC Extensions work?

on a side note : does the Telerik MVC extension extend a copy of the jQuery library, or am I responsible for adding it to my page for its operation? I would be a happy guy if I were the one who should do this, and not the extensions that do this.

+3
source share
2 answers

First, I need to stipulate some limitations, as I am one of the developers of Telerik Extensions for ASP.NET MVC. My opinion is clearly biased :)

What are your requirements? How many lines do you plan to show in the grid? How many records do you have in the database? I tested a grid with 100k db entries and 10 points per page. Performance was very good.

By default, extensions include jQuery-1.4.2.min.js, but you can prevent this and enable it yourself:

<%= Html.Telerik().ScriptRegistrar().jQuery(false) %>
+3
source

< 100 , , , , Javascript. , , 100 000 .

http://demos.telerik.com/aspnet-mvc/Grid?theme=vista, > 8300 .

0

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1765002/

More articles:


All Articles