How a base class can satisfy the definition of a parent pure virtual function using another parent function

Question

I am expanding an existing C ++ project. I have a base class that comes from two parent classes. One of the parents has a pure virtual function. I want this pure virtual function to be defined by a function implemented in another parent.

So, I want the other parent to satisfy the obligation of the base class to define the parent pure virtual function. I tried two approaches, both led to compiler errors.
Any ideas?

Here is C ++, a program demonstrating my first idea, hoping the compiler just uses the definition base2 vfunc().

// This is my first approach, hoping the parent base2 of derived would satisfy the need to define
// base1 pure virtual vfunc.

class base1 {
public:
 virtual int vfunc() = 0;
};

class base2 {
public:
 int vfunc() { return 0;} //defined
};

class derived : public base1, public base2 {
public:
 //empty
};

int main()
{
 derived d;
 base1 & b1 = d;
 int result = b1.vfunc();
 return result;
}

, derived - :

$ gcc a.cc 
a.cc: In function ‘int main()’:
a.cc:26: error: cannot declare variable ‘d’ to be of abstract type ‘derived’
a.cc:18: note:   because the following virtual functions are pure within ‘derived’:
a.cc:7: note:  virtual int base1::vfunc()

:

// This is my second attempt, defining a vfunc in the derived class that calls the other parent.

class base1 {
public:
 virtual int vfunc() = 0;
};

class base2 {
public:
 int vfunc() { return 0; } // defined
};

class derived : public base1, public base2 {
public:
 int vfunc() { return base2::vfunc(); } // call the other parent vfunc
};

int main()
{
 derived d;
 base1 & b1 = d;
 int result = b1.vfunc();
 return result;
} 

, , vtable, : (Mac OS 10.6, gcc 4.2.1)

$ gcc inheritance_tester.cc 
Undefined symbols:
  "vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info", referenced from:
      typeinfo for derivedin ccmeHq8C.o
  "___cxa_pure_virtual", referenced from:
      vtable for base1in ccmeHq8C.o
  "___gxx_personality_v0", referenced from:
      _main in ccmeHq8C.o
      base2::vfunc()     in ccmeHq8C.o
      derived::vfunc()     in ccmeHq8C.o
      base1::base1() in ccmeHq8C.o
      base2::base2() in ccmeHq8C.o
      derived::derived()in ccmeHq8C.o
      CIE in ccmeHq8C.o
  "vtable for __cxxabiv1::__class_type_info", referenced from:
      typeinfo for base1in ccmeHq8C.o
      typeinfo for base2in ccmeHq8C.o
ld: symbol(s) not found

Answer 1

, . g++, gcc. g++ ++; gcc, . :

# Option 1: compile with g++
g++ inheritance_tester.cc

# Option 2: compile with gcc and link with the C++ standard libraries
gcc inheritancet_test.cc -lstdc++

Answer 2

vfunc base1. :

class derived : public base1, public base2 {
public:
 using base1::vfunc;
 int vfunc() { return base2::vfunc(); } // call the other parent vfunc
};

Answer 3

This modified version derivedworked for me in Visual C ++. The consequence for me is that you must explicitly eliminate the two inherited ones vfunc().

class base1 {
public:
    virtual int vfunc() = 0;
};

class base2 {
public:
    int vfunc() { return 0;} //defined
};

class derived : public base1, public base2 {
public:
    int base1::vfunc() { return base2::vfunc(); } // call the other parent vfunc
};

int main()
{
    derived d;
    base1 & b1 = d;
    int result = b1.vfunc();
    return result;
}