Is it better to have many DLL dependencies or is it better to have a static link as mich as possible?
thank
No, it would be nice to send many DLLs; it is bad practice, however, to put them in% System32%. In fact, it is usually useful to use DLLs instead of static bindings; firstly, you can easily replace only the DLL that you need to update, instead of replacing the entire binary file, and for the other, if your program ultimately needs several executables that work together, you pay only for one copy DLL code (whereas with static binding you end up duplicating code that was shared).
, DLL POV, .. , . , , DLL.
, . Office Adobe . DLL - 100M + exe.
DLL, .
, . , . , ; , , , .
, DLL . , . DLL " ", . , , / / - .
, DLL. , GIMP . , DLL , , (, ..). , DLL, (, ). DLL , ", " ", " DLL.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1757751/More articles:Just sqlalchemy filter not working - pythonHow to disable this part of the CK editor? - javascriptДолжен ли я делать исключение при ошибках ввода пользователя? - phpHow to implement my own FilterSecurityInterceptor filter using grails 1.3.2 and spring-security-core 1 plugin? - javagcc, static library, external assembly becomes undefined - assemblyCss and html tips - htmlHow to sort solr without stop words - solrUse kqueue to detect hangs on the other side of the connector or the condition of the socket - bsdWhat is Extract / Transform / Load (ETL)? - databaseScript bridge callbacks? - ruby | fooobar.comAll Articles