Is it really bad practice to have an application that comes with a lot of dlls?

Is it better to have many DLL dependencies or is it better to have a static link as mich as possible?

thank

+3
source share
6 answers

No, it would be nice to send many DLLs; it is bad practice, however, to put them in% System32%. In fact, it is usually useful to use DLLs instead of static bindings; firstly, you can easily replace only the DLL that you need to update, instead of replacing the entire binary file, and for the other, if your program ultimately needs several executables that work together, you pay only for one copy DLL code (whereas with static binding you end up duplicating code that was shared).

+8
source

, DLL POV, .. , . , , DLL.

0

, . Office Adobe . DLL - 100M + exe.

DLL, .

0

, . , . , ; , , , .

0

, DLL . , . DLL " ", . , , / / - .

0

, DLL. , GIMP . , DLL , , (, ..). , DLL, (, ). DLL , ", " ", " DLL.

0

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1757751/


All Articles