When using the helper class with rspec test I don't see to use idiom .should be_false. This is normal in the function defined in the .rb helper file, but when it is inside the class, the character is be_falsenot found. Example below - why doesn’t this work? How can I use be_falseet al in an assistant?
It seems possible that he deliberately claims that such statements only work in tests. I have assistants who may fail due to, for example. network problems, which are actually unsuccessful testing attempts, because the network used by my assistants is part of the system under test. How can I make my tests fail gracefully inside the helper class?
results
$ spec ./test.rb
helper_foo 1
helper_foo 2
helper_foo 3
FunctionFoo 1
F
1)
NameError in 'my_test should test that helper classes can use should be_false etc'
undefined local variable or method `be_false' for #<HelperFoo:0x2b265f7adc98>
./helper.rb:13:in `FunctionFoo'
./test.rb:13:
Finished in 0.004536 seconds
1 example, 1 failure
test.rb
require "helper.rb"
describe "my_test" do
it "should test that helper classes can use should be_false etc" do
(1 == 1).should be_true
(2 == 1).should be_false
helper_foo()
instance = HelperFoo.new()
instance.FunctionFoo
end
end
helper.rb
def helper_foo
puts "helper_foo 1"
(1==2).should be_false
puts "helper_foo 2"
(2==2).should be_true
puts "helper_foo 3"
end
class HelperFoo
def FunctionFoo
puts "FunctionFoo 1"
(1==2).should be_false
puts "FunctionFoo 2"
(2==2).should be_true
puts "FunctionFoo 3"
end
end
source
share