Is Python-based software less professional than C ++ / compiled software?

I am working on a plugin for some software that I plan to sell someday. The software for which I create it has both a C ++ SDK and a Python SDK.

The C ++ SDK documentation looks incomplete in certain areas and is not well documented.

Python SDK docs look more complete and, in general, much easier to work with.

So I'm trying to decide if I want to solve the potential problem of creating a C ++ plugin instead of a Python plugin for sale. The only thing that makes me want to make a C ++ plugin is that a “C ++ plugin” might be easier to sell than a “Python plugin”. Many programmers there did not even consider writing Python as real "programming."

Do you think potential customers could say, “Why should I pay money for a pitiful Python script?” Unlike "Oh, it was written in C ++, so that the guy was a worthy programmer"?

Writing a Python plugin will be faster. Both plugins will look and behave exactly the same. A C ++ plugin can be faster in certain places, but for a plugin type it’s not so difficult.

So my question is: will a Python plugin not be considered as professional / marketed as a C ++ plugin, even if it looks and acts EXACTLY the same way as a C ++ plugin?

+3
source share
4 answers

Many programmers there did not even consider writing Python as real "programming."

Many "programmers" are also incompetent.

Do you think potential customers might say, “Why should I pay money for a small little Python script?”

, , , , , , , ++, , .

, : Python / ++, , ++?

.

+6

, . , " ". - . , Python, . , . , , , , , , . .

0

, , , , , . , , ?

, - , , . , -, : Javascript, , : ?

: , - . , : - , ( ), , , .

Python, YouTube.

, , PYC.

0

Python / ( , ), . ( , .pyc , - Python .)

, , , Python/++: - . Python , .

, . , , , , , ++. , , ++, , . Unix .

0

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1755224/


All Articles