SubSonic + Oracle - which is better than 2.2 or 3?

Question

I have been using SubSonic 2 and 2.2 for several years now with Sql Server. For my new job, I recently used SubSonic 2.2 with Oracle and ran into a few minor issues.

Example: it might not find a column in a table at runtime, even if it found at collation.

Does SubSonic 3 support Oracle support better than 2.2?

It seems that SubSonic 2.2 does not support stored procedures and SubSonic 3 does not work at all for Oracle

Answer 1

I did not use subscript 3 with oracle. But they were used with sql server.

.

.

3 .

3.

Answer 2

SubSonic 2.2, Windows 2000, .net 2.0

.net 2.0, SubSonic 3 .

SubSonic 3:

• T4 Engine
• ( )
• (linq, , )

and SubSonic 2 has not seen the update for over a year.