In the workplace, where many people (including managers) believe that long hours are a way to demonstrate commitment, effective arguments in favor of the fact that such practice is harmful not only to the team members themselves, but also to the project itself?
I am familiar with - and I believe - common arguments: the risk of burnout, compromised quality, insufficient attention to ensure that our skills and our code are malleable. But what are the most convincing arguments? What is the most convincing way to deliver them?
Refresh Thank you, everyone, for all the excellent links to the data - this is useful, but what I really find is that the arguments will be convincing for people who have deeply invested in the ethics crunch mode. I think I need more data to get rid of my biased concepts.
source
share