All geek questions in one place

Is there a simple but powerful IDE for C / C ++?

Possible duplicate:
C ++ IDE for Linux?

I am looking for a suitable IDE for me for C / C ++. I would not like to use projects, etc. The main idea that I accustomed to is to compile the file(do not build the project) and run the compiled program. So, things like code :: blocks, as well as M $ VC, are not for me ... well, there is an IDE FreePascal that looks exactly as I would like - I can just open the source file, run it with one the key, debug it (also the next step, but also execute the cursor and breakpoint), without seeing how gdb works, open the clock windows and so on. Is there something with similar features for C / C ++? I'm tired of editing everything in a FAR / midnight internal editor and compiling than with g ++ -o <> and sometimes using gdb from the command line when all else fails. I don't care if this is a text or graphical interface, but I just want it to be simple and free. Better if there is a highlight (maybe even a basic syntax check), very good,if the IDE can work as with memcheck / valgrind ... Any suggestions please?

+3
source share
6 answers

Qt Creator -

  • nice and easy to work with
  • as well as supported / extensible
  • cross-platform (which may be useful at some other point in time)
  • free in all the right feelings (speech, code, beer, ...)
  • doesn't force you to use qt if you don't want
  • can work with makefile

and usually does more than you, like here. Worth a look.

+8
source

Eclipse does what you ask, I would say.

, ( ), , / , , , , Linux.

+2

Code:: Blocks . , , " C/++, Objective-C" - ( , Code:: Blocks, ); , , C, ++ . IDE , . , , ( make ).

, - .

+1

IDE - ( ↔ makefile). , , . :

  • IDE (QtCreator - ) (Notepad ++ Windows, , gEdit Kate on Linux), , , (* - aka wildcard, g++ .cpp ):

    g++ -O2 *.cpp -o myprogram [.exe]

  • make IDE,

  • IDE, ​​ Eclipse, QtCreator Code:: Blocks, , .

1 3 " " , 2 , ( , Linux, ).

+1

Under linux, there is geany , which may correspond to the description of "simple but powerful", but there is no autocompletion in my opinion, you should always draw a line when developing a "simple" IDE .. when does it stop being simple?

In any case, the project concept is practically absent. Symbols are generated from open files.

0
source

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1751020/

More articles:


All Articles