Is there a convention for order (height, width) in function arguments or when displaying dimensions?
I don’t know a huge number of languages, but I used (width, height). This is more appropriate along the coordinate lines (x, y).
I would say (width, height) in the vast majority of cases. This never stops making it explicit, though (by naming arguments, etc.)
, , , ( , , ): .
(, ), , .
-
At the door and up the stairs. That mnemonics was taught for cartographic coordinates.
Screen resolution is also usually specified in "width × height".
Wikipedia Link to Display Resolution
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1745985/More articles:SQL 2005 Optimal Paging - c #Define an interface for loading custom UserControls through reflection - inheritancewarning: format '% s expects type' char *, but argument 2 is of type 'int - cclickonce, настройки приложений, редактирование после публикации - clickonceQueuing and executing a mechanism - javahttps://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&pto=aue&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ru&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=https://fooobar.com/questions/1745986/rw-access-to-shared-windows-folder-using-different-user-credentials-in-net&usg=ALkJrhh3mf94KXlxCV54BPUBdNO3QZlfwAAdding an ASP.NET User Control to Manage Dynamically - c #Creating Multiple Instances of a Custom Powershell Object - objectFlex 4 pseudo-selectors with CSS - flexC # Sketching (low quality and large size issue) - c #All Articles