Is it standard C ++ to assign a pointer to the address of another member in the constructor initializer?

Question

Does this comply with the standard?

class Foo {
    Bar m_bar;
    Bar * m_woo;
public:
    Foo() : m_bar(42, 123), m_woo(&m_bar) { }
};

Answer 1

It is right. What is wrong is the dereferencing of what the pointer is before this particular subobject has been fully initialized.