I'm going to use VTD-XML (found at http://vtd-xml.sourceforge.net/ ), but I'm interested in getting real-time feedback from anyone who has used the library and has any comments.
There are tests in the URL ( http://vtd-xml.sourceforge.net/ ), but if someone used VTD-XML and has comments on it, I would like to hear them. Speed is the deciding factor in the application, and comments after real use by developers are what I'm looking for.
Hi,
VTD-XML performance has been measured by a number of sources, some of which are listed below.
This report ( https://code.ai.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/trac/xcf/wiki/Evaluation ) contains numbers that measure parsing performance / xpath compared to XOM, binary XML, SAX and DOM
Also xmlbench (search the web as a keyword) will lead you to an open source project dedicated to the XML parsing performance site
The VTD-XML website also has a number of sample reports (there will be updates soon).
VTD-XML XPath. DOM XPath , 20 17 . SAX, SAX XPaths, " " . VTD-XML, xml 20 !
I found that VTD-XML was really faster for parsing and XPAth, but I found that XPath uses a lot more memory than the DOM. In addition, Java version 2.10 simply did not work with attributes and XPath, so that was not the case.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1738640/More articles:Installing Sphinx on App Engine - maybe? - python.Net SDK or samples for the OpenSRS API? - c #How to fix a problem with the memcache dialing method always crashing? - phpAdd information via stored procedure and PHP? - phpIs singleton thread structure safe? - c #Eclipse buildtime и классы времени выполнения для легкого выполнения тестовых примеров junit - classpathHow to combine mp3 with jpg / png / - java"Performs installation", by agreement, updates the established goals? - linuxNormalizing (webdav) unicode paths - filesystemsC ++ masking passwords - c ++All Articles