IPhone App ID and Provisioning ... The application identifier is used instead of the initialization identifier, if I decide to use Push?

This is a question that annoys me for a while. I started my application (now presented - not yet approved), not wanting to get into the mess, which is APNS (Push).

I have done the following:

IPhone Developer Center: Support Portal-> Provisioning: Then I created a development and distribution profile. I installed both in Xcode. Everything is bad. The development profile scares me a little, as it expires so soon (90 days), but I can delete it from the iPhone (s) and sign it later. I tested using the Development profile, and then sent it by signing it with the Distribution profile. Then I downloaded the application, signed by the distribution profile, into iTunesConnect (application store).

Well, as I understand it. Now I don’t understand: now that I understand theories and methods of Push, I want to add them to my application.

I already went: iPhone Developer Center: Provisioning Portal-> Application Identifiers: and created the Provisioning Provisioning Profile and the Provisioning Profile (push and in-app support included).

This is where it confuses me. All the books and documents that I read say that I have to sign the application with this push-enabled application profile from now on.

Does this mean that I no longer use previously created provisioning profiles?

" " Xcode, "-push" . ~/Library/ / 2 . One Devel . 4, "non-push"? ( , , , Push?)

Confused.

- ? " " - push? . "Push Enabled" ? , push (, , )?

, . .

!

+3
2

, ,

, , , " " ( push) .

, . , Apple , , , Push, , , .

: , " ", APNS. , .

, , .

+2

, , . .

0

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1737767/


All Articles