After WCAG 2.0, should I follow the recommendations of WCAG 1.0?

Question

Is WCAG 2.0 released if we follow only the WCAG 2.0 guidelines, or should we combine the lack of need to consider WCAG 1.0 now?

or if I am considering a WCAG manual, then I need to consider any other recommendations along with WCAG, such as RNIB, DDA Act, Section 508, etc., or if I am already considering a WCAG manual, then you do not need to look for another region specific recommendations / actions, etc.

Is the WCAG guide correct and best to follow any other website recommendations from any region?

Answer 1

, .

BY, , WCAG 2 (A, AA, AAA), , .

, , , , , , .

WCAG 2 W3C WCAG 1, WCAG 1, , : .

WCAG 1 , , . , , " " " ". , , , . " " , , , .

WCAG 2 , , . . , " ".

, , , ( " " ), , WCAG 1 , , .

, , . , , WCAG 2 ; , , WCAG 2 ( , ), .

, , , , , .

, , , (WCAG1\2, DDA, 508 ..).

Answer 2

, WCAG 1.0 WCAG 2.0: http://wipa.org.au/papers/wcag-migration.htm

, , , . , . WCAG 2.0 , , -, .

WCAG 1.0, . , , WCAG 2. WCAG 1.0 WCAG 2.0. . , .

WCAG 1.0 WCAG 2.0 - , : , , .

, , , WCAG 1.0 2,0, .