I want to learn ASP.Net 2.0 / 3.5 / 4.0, should I start with ASP.Net 2.0 and then cover the rest?

Question

Actually, I want to clear what ASP.Net 2.0 should do first, and then upgrade to 3.5 and 4.0?

OR

I start with ASP.Net 3.5 / 4.0, and most ASP.Net 2.0 will also be covered in it, and the rest should I cover the afterword?

What bothers me is the fact that if I start covering ASP.Net 2.0, will I learn obsolete things?

Which approach would be better, I am an experienced C # developer, and I have a little knowledge of web development, but I never create a professional web application.

Thank..

Edit: I know that there are too many training questions, but I have a certain point of view regarding what needs to be done first, when the situation changes quickly, and I think that many people may face the same question ..

Answer 1

Start with the latest language syntax, for example. C # or VB.NET because you probably expect these features to take effect instantly. Even the latest syntax is increasingly found in code samples posted on the Internet to help you learn. I would suggest the same for the structure and its contents as ASP.NET classes.

, / , , . .

,

• framework = .
• = +, +, -,...

" ", , (-) , ; , , , .

. , .

: ASP.NET MVC , .

Answer 2

ASP.NET(Webforms).

ASP.NET MVC.

ASP.NET , -. "" , , , , -.

Answer 3

. 2.0, , . CLR, . , ASP.Net. winForms, , , .

, , , . . .

Answer 4

ASP.NET 3.5, MVC LINQ. .NET 3.5 .

,

Answer 5

, wikipedia .

Answer 6

ASP.NET(Web Forms), --, .

#, # .Net 2.0.

, , ASP.NET MVC. , , , ASP.NET MVC - , , -. , , , .

- -, jQuery. , jQuery , Visual Studio Microsoft. jQuery MVC-only Web-.

Video resources at www.asp.net can help you get up quickly.