I recently saw some links to POX or "plain old XML". Is there a way to simplify the use of XML?
Wikipedia says :
Typically, people use the term [POX] as a contrast to complex, multi-layered XML specifications such as for web services or RDF.
Personally, I think using XML Schemas and DTDs is too complicated, so I would welcome simplifying the use of XML. But maybe it's just me.
Not really. The fact is that some people (rightfully) do not want to delve into XML / XPath / Schema / RDF / RDF-XML / OWL and much more, and they are happy to write
<MyStuff> <Foo>bar</Foo> </MyStuff>
XML . , POX, JSON , .
, , -, ... . , .
POX , .
. xml, POX. , XML, . xsd-to-java ( xsd-to-#/Php/Ruby/etc.?). , : XSD - , xml - . . .
I generally prefer to generate schemas from class files (Java in my case), so your object model is at the center of "everything."
I have to work with complex circuits on a daily basis. I'm upset, and most of them have a steep learning curve. Once you pass a certain level, they become very flexible, but it does not become easier.
I never write complex schemes, although I write schemes. Simplicity is my preferred method.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1722319/More articles:embed python in melab file in matlab on os x - pythonHow to use speech recognition from / to a video file? - c ++Rails and ASP.NET MVC when to use them? - ruby-on-railsGrails: обратный вызов JSONP без идентификатора и класса в файле JSON - restС# Способ сериализации List в настройках, содержащих любой символ (Regex/xml) - c#Set language to swedish - asp.net-mvcRepeat specific scripts after loading jQuery AJAX - javascriptKey-based authentication with net-sftp in Ruby - ruby | fooobar.comSQL performance error for IN and OR - sqlLine output in Drupal - drupalAll Articles