I had this doubt at some point, some say that in EJB 3.0 there is no such thing as entity beans. Is there any way to say this, EJB 3.0 uses JPA to save data, and there is no improvement for the beans object from the previous version (EJB 2.1) that it just returned. Another thing is that EJB 2.1 uses abstract POJOs and EJB 3.0 uses non-abstract POJOs. I need a clear description of these facts.
Objects managed by EJB3 / JPA are not EJBs, they are just POJOs. Entities in EJB 1/2, however, are EJBs, with strict restrictions on their hierarchy.
EJB2 , EJB3 .
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1721671/More articles:How to automate testing of an Outlook add-in? - c #Localization of text including subscripts and inline images in WPF - user-interfaceКак заставить ActiveRecord работать с устаревшими секционированными/оштрафованными базами данных/таблицами? - ruby-on-railsJQuery UI Tabs - открыть ссылку внутри вкладки через ajax - javascript"Expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before" How to catch delete line (from keyboard) in datagridview? - c #read a line back and end first with "/" - pythonIn a jQuery AJAX post, is it possible that the data payload is not sent? - jqueryJApplet / JPanel does not accept KeyListener events! - firefoxRegex for file names without url? - urlAll Articles