All geek questions in one place

TFS 2010 Basic (beta 2) vs Subversion et al.

For a solo developer using the beta version of Visual Studio 2010 2, is TFS Basic a better option than Subversion (with VisualSVN or Ankh) and (optionally) something like Cruisecontrol?

I do not need a distributed source or even remote access. I do not care about the deployment and all the messages. I just want version control and potentially automatic testing and creation.

EDIT: answer Bob Aman's questions (thanks to Bob)

I considered the possibility of self-placement, but as you say, this is a good idea. I regularly refresh myself. Only I will have access to the repository, so access control will not be difficult. I have an MSDN subscription, so the cost is not a problem. The repository will not become especially large - I am not so productive.: /

+3
source share
2 answers

. , ? ( , , . .) Subversion. , TFS. ? ? ? - , TFS, . Subversion , .

, TFS, Subversion, , . Subversion Visual Studio, TortoiseSVN. , , TFS MSDN.

, - (, ), , , Perforce.

+3

, Microsoft, subversion.

TFS - - .

, , - , visual studio. , (, , ), .

, , . Visual studio , - , tf.exe, TFS. .

. Subversion . , diff, TFS . , , TFS , .

TFS Windows . Windows, , , .

+4

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1721355/

More articles:


All Articles