I'm starting to pay more attention to making my javascript and ajax degrade gracefully. Which is more recommended:
I tend to different sets of pages because it makes me feel better and I get the best results for each type of user (js-enabled or js-disabled). Do you agree with me, and if not, why don't you agree?
I am also worried about hacking attempts. For example, a hacker gets into a js-enabled version and then disables his js. Any thoughts on this? I don't know much about hacking, but could it be a security issue if I go with separate versions?
Thank you in advance
, JS- -JS, - , , , , . , , . , , . - : JS , , JS: ? .
: , . ( ) , . , JS . , , JS JS, , .
, Progressive Enhancement: , - , .
, , , ( , , , , , javascript) .
, ajax. , ajax js. js-, , , -js-. AJAX -, URL.
, , jQuery Ajaxy. ajax - , - JavaScript . , .
( ) http://wbhomes.com.au http://www.balupton.com
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1719360/More articles:BioPython: skipping bad GIDs with Entrez.esummary / Entrez.read - pythonjquery ui async ajax query set for false reasons - jqueryHow to use XML to store a simple object (C #) - c #Is there a compact or express version of SQL Server that I can pack using my WinForms application and is free? - c #API for providing notifications when adding or deleting a file in a folder - c ++Installing a local package that is not .tar.gz - rIs it possible to test a WAP site without using a mobile phone? - testingPyQt context menu - pythonJava: поведение статических полей в разных исполнениях - javaStop postback in TextChanged - validationAll Articles