Is 5 Why is analysis better suited to finding the root cause of the problem?

Question

Is 5 Why is analysis better suited to finding the root cause of the problem?

by doing this, will it become a blame game?

Answer 1

This is a good way to reflect and expand the problem area and make sure that you do not eliminate the symptoms.

For each meeting or group discussion, you need a facilitator who ensures that the group does not go crazy and does not take the train out to sea. His mediator task is to intervene when subjective opinions are expressed ... you need to be objective in this case.

Answer 2

5 whys - , , , , . , , , .

Answer 3

"5 " , . . , , - . ? , "5 ".

Answer 4

, "5 Whos"!

... " ". 5 Whys - , : , , , , .

, , , . "". , , - . : " ?" ..

, , . , , . , .

Answer 5

, , , . , , , .

Answer 6

5 , Ishikawa/Fishbone/ . 5, . () 5 " ", .. .

Why tree analysis is a much better approach to use if you are configured to use Whys to find root causes.

See this link for some great example effects with several reasons http://www.thinkreliability.com/Titanic.aspx