I want to configure TFS permissions to better reflect the responsibilities and levels of mine clearance for different roles in my organization; I found that the default Reader and Contributor groups are too coarse for my needs (and too weakly named).
To keep maintenance overhead to a minimum, I am thinking of replacing the Contributor and Reader groups with my own groups, but ... Is there any negative side effect to removing these two groups? Is any part of the TFS affected by them?
. .
( , TF Valid Users TF Licensed Users. , TF Service Accounts, . " " TFS. , , , , GUID .)
, " ", , (, TF), catch-22. , , "- TFS", .
-Edit -
, , - Sharepoint Reporting Services. TFS Admin Tool - .
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1714766/More articles:Many-to-Many relationship in DataNucleus (JDO) not persisting - javaHow to avoid mass shelling onmouseover onmouseout? - javascriptWindows WCF Credentials - c #get_allowed_auths () in paramiko for authentication types - pythonPeriodically Slow Mysql Table - Why? - performanceSparkle frame does not check for updates on startup - cocoaBuilding a call table for template functions in C ++ - c ++So why should we use POST instead of GET to publish data? - httpASP.NET: getting allowed roles for a page - c #Comparing date and time from GMT to other (eastern, mountain, pacific, indian, ..) formats - c #All Articles