Learning HTML: “Wrong,” but simple, “right,” and hard?

Question

The question asked a couple of minutes ago gave me this idea ... If you taught someone HTML today, it would be much more complicated than a couple of years ago.

For example, a tag <font>is simple, simple, and straightforward. But now it is intended to be a shredding block in future versions of HTML. I could not imagine how today we are trying to learn HTML the “right” way with CSS and style: -type markup.

So where is the line? . Does anyone recognize tags that are easy to understand but not recommended? Or should you insist on getting the CSS and styling that passed the test from day one?

Answer 1

Find out the correct and valid way. This will reduce bad habits, and ultimately you will have to learn less.

Answer 2

I do not agree. I think HTML is easier today. You look at modern, clean HTML and what you see: pure, HTML, with minimal markup.

The presentation is wise, she has nothing to scream. But CSS fixes that.

CSS makes it even better. Simple changes have a dramatic effect. These dramatic effects lead to quick satisfaction and feedback. It also allows people to make radical changes that affect “everything,” not the mileage and distribution of these changes.

This makes mistakes erroneously, which again leads to faster success and faster confidence.

CSS HTML? . .

, IMHO, HTML , " ".

Answer 3

. , , , - . , litle htnl, - , , , , .

, -, , . , "" -. , , .

, , .

Answer 4

HTML . ; , , :)

HTML, , , HTML, , -, , <p> <ul>. "ew , !" itch, CSS style , .

, , HTML , , , . , , HTML , .

Answer 5

, , OLD- . , , . DOS/QuickBasic, , : " , , , - , ". , , QuickBasic.

, ?

. .

<h1 > , <p> , <b> , <div> . , HTML, , IE8 (... , ... , , IE8 - ; -)

, . , ( CSS) ( -), .

.

Answer 6

. , HTML .

Now, just teach in 2 steps. First, teach some basic semantic tags, such as headings, paragraphs, and lists, and then teach them how to create a stylesheet for their styles. Then move on to more tags and a more advanced style.