Is language adoption driven by the performance of its available IDEs?

Question

Simply put, if the designers of a new language want it to be adopted and interested in the largest group of programmers, should these designers create high-performance (from the point of view of Intellisense functions) to stimulate the adoption of the language?

Answer 1

Yes.

Even if you have created the most useful, most advanced language on the planet, I'm not going to waste my time coding if I need to use notepad.

Answer 2

. , .

IDE - , - . , .

Answer 3

. , API. IDE IntelliSense, API, .

Answer 4

, , IDE. IDE, - (Unix, , Rails,...).

Answer 5

, IDE .

, IDE VB .

, IDE . .

Answer 6

, . IDE HTML? Javascript? ? PHP? .. , , IDE - .

Answer 7

, , " ".

Answer 8

"". , , IDE IDE Vim.

IDE, .

: SO, Objective-J, .

Answer 9

In an environment where developers are used to a good IDE, it is more difficult to protect the use of the new language if some of the IDE users use insufficient language support.

eg. There are many new languages ​​on the Java platform that can be used in conjunction with Java, such as Groovy, Scala, JRuby, etc. So far this has been a problem if you want to start using Groovy and some of the developers use Eclipse because Groovy support in Eclipse has not been so good (fortunately, this is changing now).