It is mentioned that one of the advantages of Lock (java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock) over the built-in lock is that Lock facilitates the "chain lock". Lock the chain, hold the lock for A, then acquire B, after receiving B leave A, and then get C ...
I'm just wondering if you guys are faced with a situation in which it was necessary to use a chain lock?
Cheers, vic
Any situation where you have a series of critical sections that are interdependent, but you want to execute them in order, would be appropriate.
, , . , - , , . , , , .
, , . , . - , . /, .
, , . , , , , , .
, , java , , . , .
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1713175/More articles:SQL: CASE constraint (number of conditions WHEN, THEN) - sqlinteracting with a browser using C # - c #Asp.net markup formatting for Visual Studio - formatCatch All URL - asp.net-mvcRuntime.exec forces duplicate JVMs to hang indefinitely until it is killed (Solaris 10) - runtime.exechttps://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&pto=aue&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ru&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=https://fooobar.com/questions/1713176/threadsleep1-is-too-slow-for-a-silverlight-animation-is-there-an-alternative&usg=ALkJrhijXNu6sHrO8fylnwS00RJFbirijQThe problem of the coverage of the template system - scopesites for entertainment with php - phpWhy does the map return an empty array? - dictionaryWhat do errors that conflict with types mean? - iphoneAll Articles