All geek questions in one place

Source control with Visual Studio integration (preferably free)

We have been using Visual Source Safe 6.0d for a long time, and that’s good for us. However, trying to upgrade to SourceSafe 2005, we found that it was worth an arm and a leg! Also, this does not seem to be a painless update. However, we want another solution to cost less money (preferably for free). As long as it has integration with Visual Studio, it will work for us.

I heard that SubVersion with the VisualSVN plugin is a good alternative. Has anyone done this switch before? If so, how painful was that?

EDIT: We have a small group of developers, less than 10 years old. We do not need to have control over web resources, it will be just internal.

+3
source share
7 answers

We were also long-time users of Visual SourceSafe 6 and made the transition about 6 months ago to VisualSVN / TortoiseSVN, and we never looked back. The extra performance and flexibility that our 4-team team provides is enormous.

There are some habits of the concepts of branching and merging, but nothing that is not described in the Subversion documentation.

I found that I often use Windows Explorer integration for TortoiseSVN for most tasks, such as updating and fixing, but VisualSVN integrates perfectly with the IDE and costs money.

+2
source

VisualSVN Server + AnkhSVN VS. . TortoiseSVN, - , , .

+4

SVN CruiseControl.net . Tortoise , explorer. . VisualSVN . , .

, SourceSafe.

+3

SVN, , ( tortoiseSVN, ), .

, http://www.plasticscm.com/ PlasticSCM, git/mercurial, , Visual Studio. , SourceSafe, , SVN.

+3

VisualSVN (50 $ iirc), AnkhSVN, VisualSVN.

, sourcesafe repo svn, ..

.

+1

XXI , , mercurial , , . . Visual Studio visualhg. blogged , , .

Mercurial lan, , , , aproximations .

+1

SourceGear Vault?

VSS. VSS- Visual Studio, .

SourceGear Vault . 10 240 .

0

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1712044/

More articles:


All Articles