I have a page that uses jQuery UI and calls datepicker in two different text fields. No calls, i.e. just loading the page without adding a date, the page loads in 1.20 seconds. When connecting date pickers, the page loads in 3.92 seconds. (this is in firefox)
How can I get this speed? Based on the network diagram in Firebug, this is not a network problem, but it seems to be related to datepicker attachments. Is there any way to speed this up?
In addition, the behavior is observed only in Firefox 3.0.11. Chrome is fast and simple, and IE7.
dfa . Firebug. , . firebug , 0,5 , .
Firebug, , . , "", , , "", , .
, : - jQuery UI.
, , , . , , - DOM ( , ..), ( , jQuery UI date picker, )?
: http://net.tutsplus.com/articles/web-roundups/20-tools-to-make-the-life-of-a-web-developer-easier/. http://tools.pingdom.com/, . , .
Use FireBug and YSlow plugins for FireFox. The former allows synchronization and logging, while the latter has a list of rules and makes suggestions as to what needs to be configured.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1710799/More articles:Localization of ArgumentException.Message in .NET. - c #Capturing rel and href type links in C # - c #Static class members in a shared library - c ++Получение значения атрибутов href во всех тегахв html файле с помощью Python - pythonGridLines not showing in GridView with CSS reset? - cssRemoving relational index parameters when scripting table index in SQL Server 2005 - sql-server-2005Extjs form tolerance - javascriptCompute bittorent info_hash using java - javaWhat is the best way to create an XML document that conforms to the XSD schema? - c #CSV to Hash - perlAll Articles