I have a website and I use clean URLs for all links. I am wondering what is the opinion of short, basic URLs and longer descriptive URLs.
For example, if my site was about Georgia Bulldog football news, which would be better for SEO purposes?
http://www.example.com/news
or
http://www.example.com/georgia-bulldog-football-news
I read quite a bit, but a simple and descriptive factor tears me apart. Can anyone give opinions based on SEO experience?
, URL-. , , . , URL-!
.
, Google URL- . , (, ), , . , , - .
URL-. , . , URL- , - (, ).
. .
, Google, , , Google ( ). . :
http://searchengineland.com/supercharge-your-urls-for-maximum-seo-impact-14006
, . , .
georgiabulldogs.com/news
southerncollegesports.com/news
, URL- , , URL-.
No.1 SEO, , URL. ( , null, , ) SRACKOVERFLOW. COM .
No.2 , . , Google !
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1708761/More articles:.NET custom form designer: How to implement IMenuCommandService? - c #Capturing a wpf popup while restricting the main window - wpfWhich is better: write functions or write methods? What costs more performance? - iphoneThe perfect focus on WPF canvas - layoutHow can I architect and execute individual reporting on my own? - designWhat is the preferred process for installing applications on OSX? - installerExpand or reduce the screen size depending on the screen size - htmlАвтоматическое обновление фаз сборки Xcode для цели? - build-processIs creating an association entry unobtrusive when trying to access? - ruby | fooobar.comASP.NET application and local timezone - timezoneAll Articles