Source Control: should the source tree tree of the mirror server of the source tree?

Question

Is it better to use the local source tree in the server source tree? It seems to me that he should, however, my department does not work like that, and I find him very confused. If not, what are the scenarios where it makes sense to deviate from the original server tree?

EDIT: To clarify what I mean - let's say that the source directory that we want to map to on the local machine is here on the server:

\\ TeamServer \ Project \ Releases \ 2008

On our local machine, this directory will be displayed as follows:

D: \ 2008_Releases

instead:

D: \ Project \ Releases \ 2008

Answer 1

, , . "gotcha" . , , .

-, , , , . ; ;)

Answer 2

, , . , , () , , , , .

, , . cvs co svn co, . make ant - , .

Answer 3

/ . PITA, "c:\project\releases\2008" -part.

, , , ( postbuild, ).

Answer 4

: . . , , "rm -rf" ...

Answer 5

, - , , , , . - , , , atm.

Answer 6

- , , , . - - , . , , , .., , .

TFS, . C:\Source Control, , Team. - , .

TFS , , , . . TFS, , , , - .

. . . , , , . ( ), .

Answer 7

, , ?

- , .

, , , (\projectname). , ( Windows), , (6 ). .

. , .

; , , , - .