I'm confused ... How can MS release two versions of Silverlight without proper support for WCF bindings? Should they not support wsHTTP binding at least? So, can a service have proper message-level security? (i.e. certificates, etc.)
With basicHTTP binding, it seems that there are only two options for protecting a service:
Did I miss something?
, BasicHttpBinding , (APTCA).
Silverlight - , Silverlight , . , WCF basicHTTP HTTPS. , WCF .
, , , Silverlight . , , Silverlight. Afterall Silverlight " HTML, HTML".
Silverlight , WCF , .
, Microsoft boffin . " "
http://silverlight.net/forums/p/20844/78325.aspx#78325
Silverlight V2.0 . BasicHttpBinding PollingDuplexHttpBinding.
(, " ", . !)
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1705008/More articles:Deployable content in a Visual Studio 2005 project ... how? - build-processHow to create an interface similar to Excel spreadsheet on iPhone? - user-interfaceASP.NET MVC vs Webforms - asp.net-mvcHow to use checkbox in Delphi? - delphiЧто происходит, когда JSP завершает выполнение? - javaNested structure in a template class with std :: map :: const_iterator? - c ++301 redirect static page - seoКак вы считаете, пример хорошо структурированного n-ярусного приложения .Net? - designHow can I use C code in a C # project? Wrapper class? - cProblem with disabling submit buttons in submit form - javascriptAll Articles