Is there a better PureMVC alternative for flash projects?

Question

I used PureMVC in a previous Flash project ( not Flex). After he adapted to his requirements, he worked well, but I had the feeling that he was too redesigned and bulky. I noticed that Mate had a lot of positive feedback due to its clarity and simplicity, but this only applies to Flex projects, not Flash.

Would it be easier or clearer to just keep my own MVC partition without a structure like PureMVC in Flash, or are there any alternatives to PureMVC?

Edit: The only easy opponent I found was flashMVC .

Answer 1

Do you need a hammer, hammer or shoes?

There is no answer. The frame is as good as the intended use.

what I say is normal that there is no one final solution. take project by project. I coded AS, since AS first existed and twisted my wheels on these questions only to find that there is not a single objective answer other than this.

Good luck

Answer 2

You can try Gaia ( http://www.gaiaflashframework.com/ ). It is more of an interface, but I'm sure it is better than nothing. You could create a very simple rear end that blends well with it.

Maybe worth a try.

Answer 3

PureMVC , , Flash Flex . , " ", , "" , Pure, ( )... , . :

http://www.adrianparr.com/?p=83

Answer 4

ASAP. .

Answer 5

Swiz. , Flex, , MXMLC ( Beans.mxml). ActionScript, Aral -.

, Mate Swiz , . MVC- . . , Mate , Swiz [Mediate] . Mate MXML, Swiz , ActionScript. , Mate , Swiz [Autowire].

Answer 6

Although my answer is biased, as I am the author of FlashMVC ( www.flashmvc.com ), I am sure that the highest flexibility has been made, being as simple as possible to implement. One import operator is required there, and the whole structure is about 3 classes. The hello-world example can be just a couple of lines of code that oppose PureMVC, which can be dozens. I used it both in very small projects, and in industrial sizes.