I cannot think of any reason why we need to have multiple files inside a group of files. The reason I think about this is because we can control the T-SQL level (end user) about a group of files, but we cannot control the T-SQL level (end user) about individual files in a group of files. Any comments or ideas why the files are still needed?
thanks in advance George
Having multiple files per file group is only useful for the following reasons:
" ", SQL Server 1 , . , , , Microsoft.
. SQL Server 4.2 7 sql FAT32, 4 . ( , ) - DBs 4 FAT.
, , : Windows FAT32 2 . , ( MS Access-Database). , (: 2 ), . , , . . , , , tabledata. , , , . "" maxize (: 2 ), . , "" ( , , (, 1 ) , RAID. . ). , , http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms188730%28v=sql.105%29.aspx. , " R:", " S:", . , .
I could provide a long explanation, but MSDN does a good job of this here . You may not need to have more than one file in a group of files, but this does not apply to all.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1703658/More articles:Help Using Flotilla and Ruby on Rails - ruby-on-railsWhere to place the primary key - sqlПредварительная регистрация класса окон ATL - winapiПередайте несколько аргументов CreateThread - c++Website design or logical interface first? - javaWhat is the best way to split two database backup files using MS Sql Server 2005? - sql-serverWHY - "GENERAL UPDATE INSERT AND SELECTION OF APPLICATION" sat down? - sqlНужен хороший пример LinqDataSource в коде, а не разметка - linqHow to print the literal "null" for undefined values in Perl? - nullGoogle search returns blank page - search-engineAll Articles