All geek questions in one place

Good or bad practice using regular html

It’s convenient using html, it’s easier for me to just use regular html in my views, for example, creating a text field with <input type="text" maxlength="30" name="firstname"><% = html.textbox ("firstname")%> instead. Or <form method="post" name="myform">instead <% html.beginform() { %>.

Is this considered bad practice? Should I force myself to use helpers, etc.? Will I encounter problems if I continue to use regular html?

Just what I was interested in, since most of the examples and things that I see on the Internet use all of the above helpers and methods ...

+3
source share
6 answers

- PHP . - , , - ( javascript, , ), . HTML-, .

+3

HTML runat = "server" , .

ASP.NET , (, , ) , , , javascript. viewstate, (!) . HTML.

, , ASP.NET ( ) HTML-. WYSIWYG, , , , , .

+1

HTML . ; , HTML, , HTML . , , , . , , , / -.

+1

, - "" .

  • , HTML.
  • , , - , , , . "BeginForm".

, .

+1

Html html . , Html.BeginForm actionurl ( , ). actionurl, , . Htmlhelper, Webform. . html-, . mvc gridview.

0

When I first worked on MVC, I tried to use Html Helpers and even create my own helpers. However, when I tried to use jQuery / Ajax in my application, I try to use more and more raw HTML. I don't think using raw HTML is bad practice. If you need more control on the client side, it will be easier for me to work with the source HTML.

0
source

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1702382/

More articles:


All Articles