Does anyone use Distributed VCS in a corporate environment?

I am curious to hear about people with distributed version control in a corporate environment.

In particular:

  • Was it difficult to get an adoption?
  • Now that he is there, does he really like?
  • What "model" are you using (hub and conversations? Something else?)
  • If you use a hub and say if there are any problems with the disk when clicking on the central server?
  • I would like to hear if someone has non-programmers working in this environment, preferably artists and the like, with whom VCS can be a little more complicated. Did it work for them?
+3
source share
3 answers

1 - , , . VCS , ...

2 - , SVN Git, , . .

3 - .

4 - - , , , , QAed .. ... .

5 - . , , , -, . , - .

+5

ClearCase IBM Rational (Atria) Multisite DVCS?

15 , 7 , IBM . .

, , , .

, .

-, - ID (Information Development - Tech Pubs) -, .

CC-MS - - "" , . , , ( ).

+1

git , . , DCVS. , . git , :

  • svn-, , git
  • committing without having to take care of assembly break (or branching for experiments)
  • avoid delayed search / merge with the central server
  • capturing results at the end in svn-trunk

By the way, it seems that after Linus gave Google regarding git), that was the usual way to use DCVS at work :)

0
source

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1702284/


All Articles