Why aren't all .NET applications using MySQL or DAO, which makes it possible to use MySQL?

I believe this question can be just as easily applied to PHP regarding MSSQL. However, when some versions of MSSQL were so expensive, I always wondered what is the real advantage of choosing it in MySQL for developing .NET. Is it difficult to use .NET tools in conjunction with a MySQL database? Why not create a kind of DAO that abstracts the differences between the two so you can use both? Since I am considering creating .NET applications, I am always wondering if I should just go with MSSQL and not even consider MySQL as an option?

+3
source share
3 answers

, , MySQL , . , " " . , BO Crystal MySQL ?

.NET ? , SQL Express Edition.

+6

MySQL .Net- , MySQL v4.1. v5.1, , , v4.1, v4.1.

.Net/Connector, MySQL, .

SQL Express Edition, websch01ar, 2 /4 ( ). , , , blob ( ), , .

+3

I used NHibernate ORM as a way to abstract MySQL, MSSQL, and others. Maybe this might work for you.

0
source

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1698990/


All Articles