What is the relative reliability of C ++ Builder versions?

Our development team works with Borland C ++ Builder 6 and CodeGear C ++ Builder 2007 (as well as Visual Studio). I hear a lot of comments about the fact that the Builder 2007 development environment crashes much more than BCB6. Does anyone have experience developing a C ++ Builder 2009 development environment, especially with a decent size application, and if so, how does this compare to 6 or 2007 in terms of overall reliability?

+3
source share
2 answers

My experience with BCB2009 so far has been mostly positive. The IDE seems stable, while installations, etc. much faster.

2009 , , - Unicode. /, , . " ".

, VCL, - , BCB...?

+4

++ Builder 2009, , , .

( QA CodeGear), 4000 Delphi, ++ Builder 2009 (. : http://blogs.codegear.com/chrispattinson/2008/09/19/38897)

cn.codegear.com, ++ Builder, . http://dn.codegear.com/article/38715 p >

+2

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1697394/


All Articles