ETS creation return value

I am using Elixir 1.6.3. I work with the Erlang module :etsin Elixir and I am a little confused by the return value of the function :ets.new/2.

According to the doc example, when calling, :ets.new(:whatever, [])I need to return what seems integer:

iex> table = :ets.new(:buckets_registry, [:set, :protected])
8207

However, when I run the same code in iex, I get the link:

iex(1)> table = :ets.new(:buckets_registry, [:set, :protected])     
#Reference<0.1885502827.460455937.234656>

So, has something changed since the documentation was written? Or is it the same thing, and am I confused by what a link is?

+3
source share
1 answer

Yes, the return value has ets:newbeen changed from integer to reference in Erlang / OTP 20.0. From README :

  OTP-14094    Application(s): stdlib

               *** POTENTIAL INCOMPATIBILITY ***

               Optimized ETS operations by changing table identifier
               type from integer to reference. The reference enables a
               more direct mapping to the table with less potential
               lock contention and makes especially creation and
               deletion of tables scale much better.

               The change of the opaque type for the ETS table
               identifiers may cause failure in code that make faulty
               assumptions about this opaque type.

               The number of tables stored at one Erlang node *used*
               to be limited. This is no longer the case (except by
               memory usage). The previous default limit was about
               1400 tables and could be increased by setting the
               environment variable ERL_MAX_ETS_TABLES before starting
               the Erlang runtime system. This hard limit has been
               removed, but it is currently useful to set the
               ERL_MAX_ETS_TABLES anyway. It should be set to an
               approximate of the maximum amount of tables used. This
               since an internal table for named tables is sized using
               this value. If large amounts of named tables are used
               and ERL_MAX_ETS_TABLES hasn't been increased, the
               performance of named table lookup will degrade.
+5
source

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1695708/


All Articles