I have this class
class ScanRequest4Command implements Validateable {
String _ScanType
static constraints = {
pScanType inList:["a", "b"]
}
}
this code worked fine in grails 2.4.4 recently we started upgrading to grails 3.1.16
now when i try to run the code if it fails and throws the following exception:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: object is not an instance of declaring class
at com.evercompliant.commands.v4.ScanRequest4Command$__clinit__closure9.doCall(ScanRequest4Command.groovy:151)
at com.evercompliant.commands.v4.ScanRequest4Command$__clinit__closure9.doCall(ScanRequest4Command.groovy)
at com.evercompliant.commands.v4.ScanRequest4Command$__clinit__closure9.call(ScanRequest4Command.groovy)
at com.evercompliant.commands.v4.ScanRequest4Command$__clinit__closure9.call(ScanRequest4Command.groovy)
at com.evercompliant.commands.v4.ScanRequest4Command.validate(ScanRequest4Command.groovy)
at com.evercompliant.commands.v4.ScanRequest4Command.validate(ScanRequest4Command.groovy)
at com.evercompliant.commands.v4.Base4Command.validateWithErrors(Base4Command.groovy:98)
at com.evercompliant.commands.v4.PortfolioManagementBase4Command.validateWithErrors(PortfolioManagementBase4Command.groovy)
at com.evercompliant.commands.v4.ScanRequest4Command.super$2$validateWithErrors(ScanRequest4Command.groovy)
at com.evercompliant.commands.v4.ScanRequest4Command.validateWithErrors(ScanRequest4Command.groovy:164)
at com.evercompliant.commands.v4.ScanRequest4Command$validateWithErrors.call(Unknown Source)
at com.evercompliant.data.Merchant.withTransaction(Merchant.groovy)
at com.evercompliant.data.Merchant$withTransaction.call(Unknown Source)
at com.evercompliant.utils.CorsFilter.doFilterInternal(CorsFilter.java:35)
that didn't help much. if I remove the restriction inList
, the code passes, which means the problem is in inList
.
so after checking and failing, I found that if I change the member name to pScanType
, the code passes.
so my question is this:
Is underlining unacceptable in a member name prefix? if so documented anywhere? if not, what is the problem with the code?
source
share