Sometimes when working with packrat you get this kind of output by checking the status of the packrat library:
> packrat::status()
The following packages are tracked by packrat, but are no longer available in the local library nor present in your code:
_
viridisLite 0.2.0
You can call packrat::snapshot() to remove these packages from the lockfile, or if you intend to use these packages, use packrat::restore() to restore them to your private library.
The following packages have been updated in your library, but have not been recorded in packrat:
library packrat
RSQLite 2.0 NA
blob 1.1.0 NA
formatR 1.5 NA
Use packrat::snapshot() to record these packages in packrat.
The following packages are out of sync between packrat and your current library:
packrat library
BH 1.65.0-1 1.60.0-2
R6 2.2.2 2.2.0
Rcpp 0.12.13 0.12.7
Rfacebook 0.6.17 0.6.15
assertthat 0.2.0 0.1
backports 1.1.1 1.0.5
colorspace 1.3-2 1.2-6
curl 3.0 2.1
dplyr 0.7.4 0.5.0
htmltools 0.3.6 0.3.5
httr 1.3.1 1.2.1
jsonlite 1.5 1.4
lazyeval 0.2.1 0.2.0
openssl 0.9.8 0.9.4
reshape2 1.4.2 1.4.1
scales 0.5.0 0.4.1
stringi 1.1.5 1.1.2
tibble 1.3.4 1.2
yaml 2.1.14 2.1.13
Use packrat::snapshot() to set packrat to use the current library, or use
packrat::restore() to reset the library to the last snapshot.
My question is: which one should be run first, restore()or snapshot()? I looked at the packrat documentation, but there seemed to be no way to do parameterized updates, i.e. nitpick on packages.
UPDATE:
Following Alex’s suggestion below, I received the following invitation:
> packrat::restore()
Adding these packages to your library:
_
viridisLite 0.2.0
Removing these packages from your library:
_
RSQLite 2.0
blob 1.1.0
formatR 1.5
memoise 1.1.0
Upgrading these packages in your library:
from to
BH 1.60.0-2 1.65.0-1
R6 2.2.0 2.2.2
Rcpp 0.12.7 0.12.13
Rfacebook 0.6.15 0.6.17
assertthat 0.1 0.2.0
backports 1.0.5 1.1.1
colorspace 1.2-6 1.3-2
curl 2.1 3.0
dplyr 0.5.0 0.7.4
glue 1.1.1 1.2.0
htmltools 0.3.5 0.3.6
httr 1.2.1 1.3.1
jsonlite 1.4 1.5
lazyeval 0.2.0 0.2.1
openssl 0.9.4 0.9.8
reshape2 1.4.1 1.4.2
rlang 0.1.1 0.1.4
scales 0.4.1 0.5.0
stringi 1.1.2 1.1.5
tibble 1.2 1.3.4
yaml 2.1.13 2.1.14
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]:
The answer is no .
What I want to do is delete viridislite, not add it, and I want to add RSQLite, bloband formatRas suggested.
And now I’m also interested in how it memoiseappeared in the picture ...