Sorry if this is a naive question, but I watched a bunch of conversations from Google employees and still don’t understand why on earth I would use AE instead of CF?
If I understood correctly, the whole concept of both of these services is to create a "microservice architecture".
Although, AE should be wrapped on its own server. It mainly uses a lot of complexities with the same capabilities as CF. So when should I use it instead of CF?
(CF) Google App Engine (GAE) - . , , .
, , . CF, GAE .
CF GAE (, ):
Node.JS
ndb
App Engine , , ( ) , - , - .
App Engine , .
App Engine, App Engine Could . , Spotify App Engine.
, , , App Engine, , , , .
Google, , . , , .
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1688534/More articles:How to copy a couch to the dock - couchdbEffective use of synchronization in the macOS kernel extension - cFirestore database continues to crash - firebaseProgramming an Error with respect to "url" "app_model" does not exist LINE 1: SELECT COUNT (*) AS "__count" FROM "app_model" - pythonError or mistake? What does this unreadable string mean in the Maven release? - javaВ реальном времени транскрипция Google Cloud Speech API с gRPC от Electron - javascriptКак искать в Cloud Datastore - google-cloud-datastoreЯдро Asp.net Локализация не воспринимает другую культуру, кроме английского - localizationrendering of `.Rmd` blog posts as slides - rCsvHelper: no item is displayed for type - c #All Articles