Codenameone, Intel multi-os-engine or Oracle MAF?

Microsoft stops working with RoboVM, and I'm not even trying to figure out the problems in the companies and startups that have invested in this infrastructure.

I see three more platforms for JAVA mobile platforms: Intel multi-os-engine https://software.intel.com/en-us/multi-os-engine , Oracle MAF http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/ developer-tools / maf / overview / index.html and https://www.codenameone.com .

Does everyone have full knowledge of these structures? What about their project health? Is there any other candidate among them that, as we will see, will fall apart just like in the case of ROBOVM?

+4
source share
2 answers

I am a co-founder of Codename One , so I'm pretty biased. Please note that you also skipped J2Obj-c, which is an important option. Codename One of the previous RoboVMs for a while, and by contrast, we have a business model / income that makes long-term support more likely.

FUD MAF/MOE, , - , , , . AFAIK MAF , . , JET. PDF , , MAF 50K , , , , .

MoE . " " , . Intel , , , , . , , RoboVM. , . , Apple. , / . . MoE 50 , , , 5 .

, MOE WORA (Write Once Run Anywhere), J2Obj-C, WORA. Mac, J2Obj-C, Outlook, MOE, . , , .

+4

Windows, MOE . Mac, , , Mac. , Windows MOE iOS ( OSX).

Andrea

0

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1687528/


All Articles